• \
    Start Submission Become a Reviewer

    Reading: Correction: Assessing the Evidence for Asymmetrical Switch Costs and Reversed Language Domin...

    Download

     A- A+
    Alt. Display

    Correction

    Correction: Assessing the Evidence for Asymmetrical Switch Costs and Reversed Language Dominance Effects – A Meta-Analysis

    Authors:

    Miriam Gade ,

    Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Department of Psychology, General Psychology; Medical School Berlin, Department of Sciences, Berlin, DE
    X close

    Mathieu Declerck,

    Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Department of Linguistics and Literary Studies, Brussels, BE
    X close

    Andrea M. Philipp,

    RWTH Aachen University, Department of Psychology, Aachen, DE
    X close

    Alodie Rey-Mermet,

    UniDistance Suisse, Brig, CH
    X close

    Iring Koch

    RWTH Aachen University, Department of Psychology, Aachen, DE
    X close

    Abstract

    This article details a correction to: Gade, M., Declerck, M., Philipp, A. M., Rey-Mermet, A., & Koch, I. (2021). Assessing the Evidence for Asymmetrical Switch Costs and Reversed Language Dominance Effects – A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Cognition, 4(1), 55. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5334/joc.186

    Keywords: bilingualism, language control, cognitive control, language production
    How to Cite: Gade, M., Declerck, M., Philipp, A. M., Rey-Mermet, A., & Koch, I. (2021). Correction: Assessing the Evidence for Asymmetrical Switch Costs and Reversed Language Dominance Effects – A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Cognition, 4(1), 60. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5334/joc.195
    88
    Views
    38
    Downloads
      Published on 10 Nov 2021
     CC BY 4.0
     Accepted on 20 Oct 2021            Submitted on 20 Oct 2021

    Correction

    In our publication “Assessing the Evidence for Asymmetrical Switch Costs and Reversed Language Dominance Effects – A Meta-Analysis.” Table 10 reports estimates for the auxiliary analysis on cued language switching with short CTI. In the accompanying text of this table, we state that no language dominance effect was observed. However, this statement is wrong, because we did in fact observe a reversed language dominance effect as indicated by the estimates. Yet, this effect was only present in this analysis but in no other (main) analyses. This error was caused by an oversight and identified by an attentive reader. Follow-up analyses of this observation can be found in the auxiliary materials published on OSF https://osf.io/zjyqk/.

    Competing Interests

    The authors have no competing interests to declare.

    References

    1. Gade, M., Declerck, M., Philipp, A. M., Rey-Mermet, A., & Koch, I. (2021). Assessing the Evidence for Asymmetrical Switch Costs and Reversed Language Dominance Effects – A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Cognition, 4(1), 55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.186 

    Jump to Discussions Related content
    comments powered by Disqus